The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It is also predicts the figures of 2050.
The designated linear representation clearly Express information about the figures for manufacturing and expenditure power in the America from 1950 to 2000, and the same time fortells the trends for 2050 . The data is recognized in energy per unit.
As it is presented that the energy expenditure surged from around 30 to 65 units during 1950 to 1970. Similarly, the power manufacturing also rose from 30 and reached approximately 60 units. Referring to the information bar it is observed that in comparison with the consumption, energy production was more stable, and Indicated 90 units respectively so result of the made proportion of energy imports continue to increase from 5 to 30 units till.
It is also predicted that the quality of energy consumption will noticeably rocket and reached at 140 units whereas the production will be only 80 units. So about 60 units of energy will be consumed by 2025.
In conclusion, it is noted that a great increase in energy projection is anticipated in America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-28 | Komajeet kaur | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e same time fortells the trends for 2050 . The data is recognized in energy per un...
^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... data is recognized in energy per unit. As it is presented that the energy expendi...
^^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and Indicated 90 units respectively so result of the made proportion of energy ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07831325301 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06418366892 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2352075173 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269074789955 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103229489853 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648478986395 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143332285801 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757916183061 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.