The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030

The linegraph give us information about the energy in the USA from 1980 to 2030.
Overall, we can see that the US energy depend mostly on Petrol and oil, followed by coal and natural gas and with the lowest being Nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower.
Petrol and oil stand to be the No1 energy throughout the entire documentation starting at 35 quadrillion units and increase gradually overtime and just keep growing all the way to 2030 with a total unit of 50 quadrillion.
The usage of the natural gas and coal both fluctuating around 16 and 15 quadrillion units. However, the amount of coal consumption seems predicted to be somewhere around 30 quadrillion units by 2030 while natural gas only stays at around 25 quadrillion units.
On the other hand, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower each only being produced around 3 quadrillion units of the total usage in 1980. While nuclear and solar both increase slightly each to around 7 quadrillion units and 5 quadrillion units, hyperpower on the other hands stay almost completely the same at on 4 quadrillion units.
In conclusion, we can see that petrol and oil being the highest source of energy being produce at a total of 50 quadrillion, followed by coal and natural gas having 30 quadrillion units and 25 quadrillion. Finally is nuclear, solar, hydropower each being around 5, 7 and 3 quadrillion units.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 206, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...0 quadrillion units and 25 quadrillion. Finally is nuclear, solar, hydropower each bein...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95633187773 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86820125524 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480349344978 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2938761296 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.111111111 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102825072089 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761023367353 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13647135877 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108247355908 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156659702088 0.0819641961636 191% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.