The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given line graph illustrates 6 fuel, namely petrol
and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind,
hydropower in term of the consumption of energy in
USA between 1980 to 2030.
From the basic observation, the number of petrol and
oil rose significantlly from 1980 to 2030. Similarly, all
of details grow noticeably. The number of petrol and
oil was the highest, but the number of hydropower
was the lowest.
Looking at the graph for more details, starting at a
quiet high point, the number of petrol and oil was the
highest, following by the quantity of natural gas and
the number of coal in 1980.A significant growth of 8
was witnessed in the quantity of petrol and oil from
1980 to 2015. There was a moderate progress of 5 in
the number of coal between 1980 to 2015. The
number of natural gas improved markedly to 5 from
1980 to 2015. It is predicted that the number of petrol
and oil will upsurge substantially to 8 from 2015 to
2030. It is forecast that there will be a moderate leap
of 5in the number of coal between 2015 to 2030. It is
evaluated that the quantity of natural gas will reach a
plateau in the remaining time.
The number of nuclear rose slightly to 5 from 1980 to
2015. A small growth of 3 was witnessed in the
quantity of solar/wind from 1980 to 2015. The number
of hydropower saw an oscillations from 1980. It is
evaluated that the quantity of solar/wind, hydropower,
and nuclear will remain stable in the remaining time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 61
- Some people think that detailed descriptions of crime scenes in newspapers and on TV can have a bad influence on the public so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 28, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...ral gas and the number of coal in 1980.A significant growth of 8 was witnessed ...
^
Line 15, column 25, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'moderate progress'.
Suggestion: moderate progress
...l and oil from 1980 to 2015. There was a moderate progress of 5 in the number of coal between 198...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 49, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he number of coal between 2015 to 2030. It is evaluated that the quantity of natu...
^^
Line 28, column 19, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an oscillation' or simply 'oscillations'?
Suggestion: an oscillation; oscillations
... to 2015. The number of hydropower saw an oscillations from 1980. It is evaluated that the qu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74045801527 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66973751472 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.37786259542 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.826492323 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7142857143 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 28.0 3.83414634146 730% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105619897982 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496966656395 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397211414654 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.039616037727 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405797396059 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.