The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the figure provided below reveals the number of tourist arrivals in five nations between 1995 and 2010.
In general, it is crystal clear that the tourists arrivals among five countries all showed the upward trends from 1995 to 2010. however, their number of increase varied a lot.
In 1995, USA was the most common place for international tourist at 70 millions, followed by the figure of france at over 30 millions. however, five years later, france's tourist arrivals grew exponentially to near 70 millions, while the growth of USA during the period in question was only 10 millions. france's tourists arrivals kept a significant surge to 2010 at around 90 millions which was the same of USA.
With regard to other three countries, Malaysia witnessed a steady growth from over 20 millions in 1995 to 50 millions in 2010. Meanwhile, egypt and brazil experienced similar increase during the 20 years period. In 1995, egypt and brazil had almost the same tourist arrivals at around 10 millions and brazil was slightly more than egypt. however, egypt outweighed brazil a few years later and had a marginal higher increase until 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | bibikulsum | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | nicknguyen | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 73
- The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 78
- Nowadays the differences between countries are becoming less evident because we see the same TV Shows, advertisement, fashion and follow the same brand.To what extend the advantages of this trend outweighs disadvantages? 11
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ed the upward trends from 1995 to 2010. however, their number of increase varied a lot....
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...e figure of france at over 30 millions. however, five years later, frances tourist arri...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Frances
...eriod in question was only 10 millions. frances tourists arrivals kept a significant su...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...nd brazil was slightly more than egypt. however, egypt outweighed brazil a few years la...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in general, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04166666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49595484366 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5923192975 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1058929768 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471980196325 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408939407746 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080396096471 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342941554835 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.