The chart compares the differences between the rates of immigration, emigration and net migration in Britain during a 9-year-period between 1999 and 2008.
Overall, it is clear that both immigration and emigration rates witnessed a general increase; whereas the former was significantly higher than the latter. Meanwhile, the net migration rate fluctuated sharply during the time shown. Units are measured in thousands of people.
In 1999, the number of people came and lived in the UK was at around 450 thousand people, 150 thousand more than the number of citizens leaving the country. The net migration rate stood at about 180 thousand people, then it remained so until peaking at nearly 250 thousand people in 2004. Between 1999 to 2004, the number of people immigrated witnessed a rise of about 250 thousand people; while the figure for emigration remained steadily.
After 2004, the immigration rate fell slightly to just approximately 590 thousand people in the end. It was followed by over 410 thousand people emigrated in 2008. The figure for net migration then dropped to at around 180 thousand people in 2008 despite a high peak of approximately 210 thousand people in the previous year.
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 thousand people in the previous year.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7684424329 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6900456781 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118907769939 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535458535557 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397354960784 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080851069424 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377906202935 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.