The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the 3 sources of total air pollutants in Britain during a 15 year period since 1990.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart, the total amount of air pollutant experienced a significant decline and industry was the sector that saw a sharp fall among the three surveyed. Units are measured in million tonnes.
In 1990, the total amount of air pollutants in the UK was 7 billion tonnes, then it decreased considerately to 4 billion tonnes in 1999. The figure continued to experience a slight fell of merely 2 million tonnes in the next 3 years before reaching its lowest point at just above 3 billion tonnes in the end.
Industry accounted for the highest amount of air pollutants, at around 5 billion tonnes in 1990. There was then a downward trend throughout the period surveyed to 2 billion tonnes in 2005, with a particularly sharp fall in the middle years, from 1993 to 1999. On the contrary, transport and households generally produced fewer air pollutants than the former. Air pollutants from transport remained so throughout the period at about 1 billion tonnes, whereas the figure for households witnessed a slight decrease from around 1 billion tonnes in 1990 to just above 0.1 billion tonnes by 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-15 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which the goods are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- The line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005. 84
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 84
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...e three surveyed. Units are measured in million tonnes. In 1990, the total amount of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88679245283 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70672527135 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542452830189 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.370017155 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159430589654 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761022783252 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530694627807 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11006894465 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439721174936 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.