The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992.
The graph provides information about diarrhea rate in Mashhad from 1983 to 1992.
Overall, it is clear that there was a downward trend with some fluctuation over during whole period in question. Moreover, Mashhad inhabitants experienced the most diarrhea events in 1989.
Regarding the survey in 1983, diarrhea cases was about 100 and remained flat during the following two years. At this point, there was a considerable increase in the occurrence of the illness, reaching around 200 in 1986, and then it rose to about 230 in 1987. In the next year, disease rate halved and had the same trend as in the first three years. Despite falling in 1988, it increased by almost 300% in the following year. Next, there was a slight decrease, followed by levelling off at 350 till 1991. By the last year, the statistics showed that diarrhea rate had plummeted dramatically causing extinction diarrhea in Mashhad.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 97
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip from 2009 to 2011
- Some people suggest that social networking and online communication have increased social isolation In what ways do you think this has happened Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience 89
- The late news program has concentrated more on national news in lieu of weather and local news It is noted that the program has been frowned upon by the audience due to lessening the content they accustomed to see Moreover as a result of the modification 69
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00662251656 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60518387586 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649006622517 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9017823746 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241453368885 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104400439141 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146012441031 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22357148606 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178744175309 0.0819641961636 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.