The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian Countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
The provided line graph presents the percentage of the total population residing in cities of the Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia over the past 50 years, as well as future predictions until 2040.
Overall, all four countries experienced an upward trend in urban population growth, with Malaysia and Indonesia showing particularly alarming rates of increase. The Philippines, which initially had the highest population, is projected to be overtaken by all other countries except Thailand.
Malaysia held the second-highest urban population in 1970, with only a slight dip observed in 1990. However, it is expected to continue on an upward trajectory, reaching a peak of 80 percent in the future. Similarly, Indonesia, initially the least populated country, demonstrated a gradual increase, surpassing Thailand in 2000 and the Philippines ten years later. It is predicted to retain approximately 60% of the total population by 2040.
In the case of the Philippines, the urban population experienced minor fluctuations for a decade, followed by a swift recovery to approximately 50 percent. However, the population gradually declined until 2010 before picking up pace again, projected to secure the second-highest position by 2040. Likewise, Thailand exhibited a gradual increase until 1990, followed by a slight shift leading up to 2020. Nevertheless, it is expected to recover and stabilize at around 40 percent by the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 56
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, similarly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56306306306 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23782392573 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59009009009 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6583511733 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.272727273 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189943576206 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682943049892 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555713722384 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117599218586 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342609915148 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.