The line graph illustrates the proportion of the population living in urban areas in four Asian countries from 1970 to 2020, with predicted figures for 2030 and 2040. Overall, what stands out from the line graph is that all countries will witness a dramatic increase in their urban populations, with Malaysia predicted to experience the greatest growth.
In 1970, the Philippines and Malaysia had the highest proportions of urban population, standing at approximately 32% and 30% respectively. The number of urban residents in both countries then experienced a moderate increase, reaching around 48% in the Philippines, which was surpassed by Malaysia at 46% in 1990. From 2000 onwards, the figure for Malaysia continued to rise dramatically, projected to peak at over 85% in 2040, while the figure for the Philippines fluctuated before growing to about 55% by the end of the period.
Regarding Thailand and Indonesia, Thailand’s urban population comprised just two-thirds of the populations of the two countries mentioned earlier, while in Indonesia, the figure stood just below Thailand’s at 13% in 1970. Over thirty years, the proportion of people living in cities in both countries experienced gradual growth, reaching the same level of just below 30% in 2000. The population is then predicted to rise to around 62% in Indonesia and approximately 48% in Thailand by 2040.
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 100
- The table and chart below show the domestic water use and cost in 5 countries 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33789954338 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0365331136 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534246575342 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.5518986835 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.125 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329508339135 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147648249592 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153731684121 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226662551507 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134069173693 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.