The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
The line graph illustrates the number of city dwellers in four distinguished Asian from a report between 1970 and 2020, with estimation until 2040.
What stands out from the graph is that the percentage of the population in all four countries experienced an upward trend, with Malaysia showing the most dramatic increase. Starting at the highest point in 1970, just over 30% of citizens in the Philippines lived in urban areas. After some fluctuations over the first 40 years, this figure has risen and is predicted to continue increasing by around 20% by the end of the period. Malaysian city dwellers, which ranked second at 30% at the beginning, have made significant progress. It is also expected to maintain its upward trend until the final year, reaching over 80%, more than double the initial figure.
Finally, the two remaining categories of inhabitants living in urban areas in Thailand and Indonesia, which accounted for nearly 20% and over 10% respectively, showed upward trends throughout the 30-year period. After reaching the same point in 2000, Indonesian city dwellers surpassed the figures for Thailand and the Philippines, and are estimated to be the second highest at 60%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 56
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16494845361 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72305493234 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649484536082 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5967845327 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233345053669 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942959853466 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102809189412 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178230842533 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101332009146 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.