The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares four Asian nations in terms of the proportion of city-dwellers between the years 1970 and 2040.
It is clear that there were significant increases in the percentage of population living in cities shown on the graph. While Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia saw the numbers of people rise steadily over the 70-year period, the number of residents in cities of Philippines dropped slightly, before rising once again.
In 1970, Indonesia had the lowest percentage of people living in cities, around 15%, while the proportion of city residents of Philippines, Malaysia, and Thailand were 31%, 30%, and 19% respectively. Over the following 20 years, both four countries increased relatively steadily, by 1990, Philippines had risen to nearly 50%.
From 1990 to 2040, Philippines saw a decrease in city-dwellers by roughly 10% in 2010, before rising to approximately 55% in 2040. By contrast, the all three other countries had the people living in cities increase significantly. By 2040, Malaysia is expected to have about 85% city residents, more than double, while the respective amounts of Thailand and Indonesia are expected to be 48% and 58%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-16 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-06 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | annaalysia007 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-13 | phamuyen1210 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 67
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the make information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...donesia are expected to be 48% and 58%.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29032258065 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93168054846 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0268996723 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190650608034 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094557091897 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527693611444 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12677377235 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328253390932 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.