The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis

The diagram manifests the material about the portion of the habitants who dwelled in Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia between 1970 to 2020 and the prediction the people in these countries in following 10 and 20 years.
Overall, the percentage of population in these nations augmented, commencing at the lowest point in 1970 and finishing at the highest point in 2040.
First of all, the population of people living in Philippines were sole 30%, which were nearly stable in after 10 years. Then, they augmented to 50% in the year og 1990, which diminished by 10% within the following two years and had a slight increase in 2020. They will be predicted between 50% and 60% in 2030 and 2040. Secondly, the Malysians were exactly 30% in 1970 which slight rose and decreased in 1980 and 1990 respectively. After that, they surged between 2000 and 2020 from 60% to around 80%. They will be anticipate that they will be approximate 80% in 2030 and 2040.
Thirdly, Thais were under a fifth in the year of 1970, which steadily grew in following 20 years. Then, they didn’t alter at all from 1990 to 2020. In the year of 2030 and 2040, they will be forecast about two fifth. Lastly, Indonesians were well over a tenth in 1970 which slowly rose to over 20% and 50% in 2000 and 2020 respectively. They will be predicted around 60% from 2030 to 2040.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...st about two fifth. Lastly, Indonesians were well over a tenth in 1970 which slowly ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69327731092 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51836345845 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474789915966 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.680891934 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9230769231 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156387774802 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067675320101 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362958013252 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10557411197 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172430847561 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.