Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree

Some human beings utter that e-book and neoteric technology will entirely substitute conventional newspapers and fanzines. I strongly agree with it. In this essay, I will clarify my notion.
From the antique times, newspapers and glossies always possess loads of salutary materials. They are vended in every bookshop, market, newstand, etc. People can go there and buy anytime. But now, along with the advancement of the world, the manlike intellect augments. They can amend gadgets to assist the human’s life. Specially, newspapers and fanzines are enhanced to e-book with state-of-the-art technology. So, a number of people utilize it are rising.
They are very handy. Just type in the information you want, it will immediately show up. Moreover, their monitors are sufficient color, images and content. E-books are also amplified automatic reading function. Futhermore, it can update novel gen continuously. Besides, human beings can read and bear anywhere.
To sum up, both e-books and leading-edge technologies which support human life better, supersede utterly newspapers and periodicals.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y substitute conventional newspapers and fanzines. I strongly agree with it. In t...
^^
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...logy. So, a number of people utilize it are rising. They are very handy. Just type...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 41.998997996 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 165.0 315.596192385 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67878787879 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93613690215 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.727272727273 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 506.74238477 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 9.0 20.2975951904 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4670677049 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 55.1176470588 106.682146367 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 9.70588235294 20.7667163134 47% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180041330701 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464945910572 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512265460287 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110285760756 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545326985787 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.42 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.18 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 5.6 10.1190380762 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.