It is believed that some ready-made ailment possesses high sugar content, leading to numerous health’s issues. Therefore, some people are of the opinion that the price of sugary products shoulh be risen to prevent people from buying them. I utterly concur with this idea, which is clearly elucidated in my essays.
There are a variety of reason why these products should by confined. First of all, they are very detrimental for health’s people, which can cause a large number of aliments such as obesity, diabetes, cancer, etc. They are very hard to treat and have bad long-term effects. If citizens contract these complaints, they will feel exhausted, slothful to exercise, tend to eat more products containg sugar, making their healths more and more worse. The more sugar they absorb, the weaker they feel.
Secondly, if food and bevergae are confined by making them pricy, residents will consume them when they fell absolutely necessary. By doing so, the risk of contracting several dangerous illness will tend to diminish and people will possess good lifestyles. They only eat enough amout of sugar for their bodies, having enough energy for their work, improving mood, picking uo thinking skills, etc. For instance, when a pupil have intake a trace of food or drinks containing sugar before learning, he will fell excited about studying had full energy for other activities.
In conclusion, increasing the price of products containg glucose to confide people form using them is ver helpful. Because it can increase health’s public and make people absorb them when they need.
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant http testbig com sites default files styles max 650x650 public 15134677 555072 11
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...sen to prevent people from buying them. I utterly concur with this idea, which is...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'There is a variety'?
Suggestion: There is a variety
...ch is clearly elucidated in my essays. There are a variety of reason why these products should by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...al for health’s people, which can cause a large number of aliments such as obesity, diabetes, can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...idents will consume them when they fell absolutely necessary. By doing so, the risk of contracting s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1906614786 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44985439412 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645914396887 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.164052431 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22895817268 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753700059913 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452591681542 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132401745744 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453388411036 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.