The diagram beneath manifests material about a number of sightseers to three museum in London over a period of four months in 2013.
In June, the British museum and Natural Museum had the same of tourists ( approximate 600 thousand). During the time, visitors’s Science Museum had mere 400 thousand). But in July, the Natural History and Science Museum had an diminution of holidaymakers. The result of that, they possessed similarity tourists (less than 400 thousand). In contract to Science Museum and Natural History Museum, British Museum multiplied significantly (over 700 thousand).
In August, amout of travellers’s British Museum dropped sharply 500 thousand), while, sightseers’s decreased steadily (300 thousand). But the visitors of Naural History Museum didn’t alter at all ( just under 400 thousand). In September, the line graph all tended to the same. The tourists of all increased ( British Museum over 600 thousand; Science Museum and Natural History Museum over 400 thousand).
In conclusion, the number of sightseers spent time in those museum had a ginormous discrepancy. British Museum always had the most mumerous travellers.
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like Is it good for children What are the consequences when they grow up 61
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'museum' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'museums'.
Suggestion: museums
...l about a number of sightseers to three museum in London over a period of four months ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Natural Museum had the same of tourists approximate 600 thousand. During the tim...
^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Natural History and Science Museum had an diminution of holidaymakers. The result...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aural History Museum didn’t alter at all just under 400 thousand. In September, t...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same. The tourists of all increased British Museum over 600 thousand; Scienc...
^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this museum' or 'those museums'?
Suggestion: this museum; those museums
... the number of sightseers spent time in those museum had a ginormous discrepancy. British Mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53714285714 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88021541145 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0415061629 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201392576873 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905102011991 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603093134999 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146328436308 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620567034321 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.