The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Two above maps manifest the modification of an island when it is built more infrastructures for sightseer.
Overall, comparing the two maps, there are appreciable changes after improving. Not only a large number of facilities are erected, but also numerous activities are allowed on beach.
First of all, iin first map, which was quiet intact, only possessed a beach and a couple of trees. And in the second map, it is pickup ti serve for visitors. On the left, this island is put up many small housings whcih surround the plants. They are also built some them near the trees on the right. Moving on the beach, which is on the left edge of this island, is used for tourists to swim.
Next to the pier, there is a slight one leading to the reception and restaurant which is located in the middle and edge of this site respectively. The island is also installed numerous roads such as footpaths and vehicle tracks. The former is put around tourists' accommodation and the latter is utilized as a link between the pier, reception and restaurant.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...iable changes after improving. Not only a large number of facilities are erected, but also numero...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...ehicle tracks. The former is put around tourists accommodation and the latter is utilize...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71038251366 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63848994534 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601092896175 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6279805765 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3636363636 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137599109973 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489596158968 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344405259079 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851908164264 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355517471253 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.