The maps manifest the modification that have come off at the dock zone of a dorp called Darwin from 2009 to 2014.
In 2009, the lake was adjacent to industrial area. But until 2014, the industrial area was vanished and swimming pool was constructed at there. In the year of 2014, in the right of the lake, it also had 2 baths. The other industrialized region in the southwest in 2009 was reform into tree field and the university building was built in there in 2014. Eventually, in the yearof 214, the harbour was engineered in the southeast of the town.
Although, it had numerous divergences, they also had many resemblances. The fishing zone was remained until 2014. The lake in the middle of the north was static. Ultimately, the convention center was close it which was still until 2014.
Overall, the transmutation of the Darwin between 2009 and 2014 was more appropriate for denizens, with evoporating of industrial zone and manifest of more trees, swimming pool,etc.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 87
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...nd manifest of more trees, swimming pool,etc.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86826347305 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77565418565 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4098834159 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9090909091 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196799412219 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815545122018 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781761347736 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145849908227 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931265543079 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.