The line chart delineates the rate of Asian individuals living in cities in different countries in the period from 1970 to 2020 and projections for 2030 and 2040.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is obvious that inhabitants living in urban areas have had a tendency to increase, meanwhile, the figure for Malaysians has been higher than other countries.
As is presented in the chart, we can see that the percentage of people in Indonesia residing in cities stood at 15%, ranking last until the year 2000, after which, this data witnessed a substantial growth of 35% this year and is predicted to be doubled in the next 20 years. A similar trend was noticed in the proportion of Thai citizens living in cities. It jumped slightly from just below 20% to 30% and is estimated to go up noticeably to 45% in the year 2040.
AAs for the levels of individuals living in metropolitan areas in the Philippines, we can also see that it increased fluctuated from 30% to 45% in 2020, and projections to 55% over the period of 20 years. Turning to Malaysia, which registered a higher portion than the rest countries, the data jumped dramatically to 75% and will be nearly 90% in 2040.
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70192307692 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7704157454 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581730769231 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1325067442 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.714285714 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242894954208 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109066287966 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106072996194 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160189279643 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11643510378 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.