The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
IELTS Writing
The depicted line graph enumerates the comparative data about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with predictions through 2030.
Overall, it is evident that the figure for petrol and oil, natural gas, as well as coal gradually increased and expected to rise in the future, whereas the consumption of nuclear, solar and hydropower had similar proportion over the given period.
To initiate, the most obvious trend had seen in the figure of petrol and oil, despite some fluctuation for over one and a half decades it had dramatically risen from one-third Qu in 1995 to approximately 43 Qu in 2015 and expected to peak from 43 Qu in 2015 to nearly half Qu in 2030. Moreover, the use of natural gas and coal seems to have similar portion throughout the given period.
Furthermore, the consumption of nuclear, wind, as well as hydropower had an almost similar figure for over three decades and predicted to remain stabilized at approximately 7 Qu, 5 Qu, and 4 Qu, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-18 | Milan karki | 73 | view |
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 61
- The table below gives information about languages with the most natives speakers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Writing task 1 11
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95857988166 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89389646366 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4376749303 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 5.23603664747 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972980797149 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709256247271 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10818920388 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087911285507 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114636632885 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.