The graph illustrates the proportion of five employment types in the United States from 1930 to 2010. It is clear that in the beginning, the highest percentage of employment kind was farming, fishing and foresting. However, this became the lowest proportion at the end of the period.
In 1930, the number of agricultural employment was much greater than any other kind of job with approximately 75%. At that time, technical and industrial employees are extremely rare, just over 0%. Meanwhile, the figure of sales and office, and other services are slightly bigger with about 10%.
In 1990, with a remarkable decrease in the number of agricultural employment and significant growth in the proportion of industrial employment, they reached the same amount which is about 30%. From 1930 to 1990, there were fluctuations in the percentage of technical, sales, office, and other services. Although the number of agricultural employment reached a peak in 1930, this amount dramatically dropped out at the end of the period at just over 2.5%. Over the period, the proportion of industrial employment experienced a considerable increase to approximately 38%, whereas technical, sales and office one also climb up to 30% and 20% respectively. However, the number of other services slightly reduced by 3%.
- In future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- People think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others believe that there are other alternative solutions for reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion on this topic 61
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or to play and perform at the theater Why is this the case Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 63
- The chart below gives the information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29468599034 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03874334541 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526570048309 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3759273605 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107753883555 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446106083856 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411697858016 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822386303492 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289947835667 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.