The graph below provides a breakdown of the UK weekly market share of visits to three social networking websites between March 2007 and March 2008.
The line graph compares the data on the market share of hits to three websites in the UK from March 2007 to March 2008.
Overall, the proportion of Facebook access rose over the period shown, while that of Bebo experienced a downward trend in Internet usage. However, MySpace site became less popular.
In March 2007, Facebook site had a percentage of about 0,3% weekly, after which was a sudden increase of just over 0,5% before substantially going up to around 1,2% and eventually surpassing those for Bebo. Since then, although there was a moderate change in the trends, this social networking registered the highest at nearly 2,3% in December 2007. Facebook weekly visits topped the list of three social media with approximately 1,96% in March 2008.
The number of Bebo and Myspace used was initially on a par at about 1,2%. However, while the former gradually increased and hit a high of just over 2,3%, the latter was seen a downward tendency, which fluctuated from around 1,5% to 1,3%. MySpace site was by far the least well-known sites, with figures just exactly 0,89% weekly in the last year.
- The advantages of robots doing the basic serving functions in the entertainment leisure and retail sectors of the economy outweigh the disadvantages to what extent do you agree with this statement 83
- The graph below provides a breakdown of the UK weekly market share of visits to three social networking websites between March 2007 and March 2008 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90957446809 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42825411818 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632978723404 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7588957822 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259087896169 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107323975727 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159309819924 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183403607893 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197433367066 0.0819641961636 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.