The graph below show the average onumber of UK communters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 to 2020
The given line graph illustrates the amount of commuters travelling daily by car, bus and train in the UK between 1970 to 2020.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that there was an upward trend in the number of people travelling by car and bus, but a downward trend in that of train. In addition, the data of car was the highest.
Looking at the details, one of the fist things to note is that the amount of UK commuters travelling by car started at the highest point, that of bus and train were lower by 1970, at 5, 4 and 2 millions respectively. Over the next decade, the figures for all transport remained stable.
Between 1980 and 2000, the statistics of car went up significantly from 5 to 7 millions. By 2000, the amount of people travelling by train rose steadily while that of bus dropped slowly to 3 and 3.5 millions in order. In the last year, the data of car topped at around 8 millions, was higher than that of train 4 millions. Also the figures for bus hit a bottom at 3 millions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
- Internet users as percentage of population 61
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 62
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
- The graph below show the proportion of the population aged 54 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three differents countries 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there was an upward trend in the number of people travelling by car and bus, but...
^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s higher than that of train 4 millions. Also the figures for bus hit a bottom at 3 m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33333333333 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49124892606 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.321182831 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287929440185 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120381829411 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112669284263 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207402714135 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118471951141 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.