The line graph illustrates the changes in popularity of 5 leisure activities among older people in Europe over the period of 30 years. Overall, each activity had an upward tendency, with exception of theatre. Besides, surfing the Internet and hiking had the greatest increase among others.
Playing sport, being the most popular within the first 20 years with the highest percentage in 2000 (70%) increased slightly by 5% in 2010, becoming nearly 66%, while hiking, which initially was 3 times lower, outnumbered the former activity by 15% till the end of the survey.
Theater become the least common entertainment activity with the lowest percentage in 1990 ( just 30%). Reading, despite wild fluctuations over the shown period of time, became the third most common, with 60% in 2010. Surfing the Internet went up significantly by approximately 10 times ( from 5% in 1980 to 50% in 2010)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the changes i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the greatest increase among others. Playing sport, being the most popular wi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y by 15% till the end of the survey. Theater become the least common entertai...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivity with the lowest percentage in 1990 just 30%. Reading, despite wild fluctu...
^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t percentage in 1990 just 30%. Reading, despite wild fluctuations over the shown...
^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...espite wild fluctuations over the shown period of time, became the third most common, with 60%...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significantly by approximately 10 times from 5% in 1980 to 50% in 2010
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11724137931 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66580049349 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703448275862 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6517951075 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12117358713 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532748513039 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524898591673 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758924423614 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252794491495 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.