The given line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the sum of money spent on books in four European nations including Germany, France, Italy, and Austria during a ten-year period from 1995 to 2005, measured by millions of dollars.
Overall, as clearly shown in the graph, there was an upward trend in the entire amount of money paid for buying books in the four countries. Furthermore, it is noticeable that the German expended the largest amount of money on this purpose over the period of one decade.
It can be observed that the expenses for books in Germany stood precisely at 80 million dollars in 1995, the highest number compared to remaining countries and this leading position still was kept until the end of the period after a gradual rise to approximately 95 million. In the first year of the period, the figure for Italy was at roughly 50 million, then it saw a mild fluctuation over the next 6-year period before witnessing a moderate increase to above 60 million in 2005. It is apparent that the period between 1995 and 2005 experienced a steady growth in France’s expenditure on the items from minimally under 50 million to the peak at around 75 million dollars at the end. In Austria, despite being the nation with the lowest figure in 1995, a tremendous boom was recorded in the amount of money spent on books from 40 million in 2001 to over 70 million in 2005, overtaking the figure of Italy in 2003 and tending to narrow the gap with that of France.
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university what are the advantages and disadvantages 78
- The tables given below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1990 and 2004 in five european countries 77
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 82
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK schools in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and the comparisons whe 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68560606061 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45093905937 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6222683347 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.714285714 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.7142857143 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202334765444 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100301700845 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374585263842 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141082916153 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00858719393845 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.