The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.

Given is the line graph depicting the expenditure on books by Germanic, French, Italian and Australian people during a period of 10 years, starting from 1995.

It is conspicuous that the spending on books plunges in four countries. Furthermore, despite some wild swings, citizens in Germany spent the most on books compared to the three remaining nations over the time frame.

When it comes to the money used to buy books in Australia and Italy, beginning at 30m dollars and 50m dollars, respectively, the amount of expenditure witnessed a significant leap although the period from 1995 to 2003 saw volatility in spending in the latter country. Until 2003, the amount of money that Australia spent surpassed that of Italian, thus becoming the third highest nation allocated money on books and reached the peak at nearly 62m dollars which was 10m dollars more than Italian expenditure in 2005.

Regarding the outlay in France, approximately 55m dollars was documented in 1995, the money spent on books drastically soared and peaked at 63m dollars. Turning to Germany, a remarkable increase to 90m dollars was seen in the amount of money expensed in 1999 before a dramatic fall in the next four years and then quickly recover to hit a zenith at over 95m dollars at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-28 Kshitij Kasabekar 73 view
2023-10-02 sushiluon 67 view
2023-10-02 sushiluon view
2023-06-06 minhphambinh1234 67 view
2023-02-07 khanhlyly 78 view
Essays by user nhinhi999 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nding in the latter country. Until 2003, the amount of money that Australia spent...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n books drastically soared and peaked at 63m dollars. Turning to Germany, a remar...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, third, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00460829493 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66513278175 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589861751152 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4366807202 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.142857143 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225593662605 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104843109556 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369757885052 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129117074132 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262800340846 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.