The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The graph compares the total number of waste outputout put, which was produced by three companies including A,B,C between 2000 and 2015.
As can be seen from the chart, the amount of waste in company C experienced an upward trend, while that of company A and B recorded a downward pattern. In the first -year of the period, the figure of company stood at highest level. However, at the end of the chart, the highest number was the data of company C, and that of company B was the lowest.
From 2000 to 2005, while the statistic of company A witnessed a slight decrease at about 2 tonnes, the company B was increased the amout of waste out put to 10 tonnes. In addition, the figures of company A and B saw an similar trend in the last 10 years of the survey. Company A cut its waste from 9 tonnes to nearly 8 tonnes. The amout of waste material by company B went into free fall and ended up with the lowest number, at 3 tonnes
Moreover, the data of company C stood at just about 4 tonnes. 2005 experienced a significant leap, before the figure reached the highest number at 10 tonnes over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The plans show the park in 1920 and today
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 89
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility What are your opinions on this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
... produced by three companies including A,B,C between 2000 and 2015. As can be s...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ion, the figures of company A and B saw an similar trend in the last 10 years of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37198067633 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36707088501 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2170809053 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267200239307 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123812192245 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460652257416 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171048990619 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481788911073 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.