The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The graph compares three companies in terms of waste which was discharged by them in 15 years.
It is clear that there is a downward trend in the waste output of company A while that of company C witnessed a considerable growth over the period given. On the contrary, the amount of waste produced by company B increased fast until 2005 and then it went down significantly.
In 2000, the figure for company A was the highest with 12 tons of waste. By contrast, the proportion of waste produced by company B and C was quite low, which were 9 tons and 5 tons of waste. Half a decade later, the volume of waste which was produced by company C was gradually climbing up. Also, the figure for company B grew considerably to about 10 tons. By contrast, that of company A began falling slowly to about 11 tons of waste. In 2015, the proportion for company B decreased tremendously, which was nearly 3 tons of waste while that of company C went up remarkably to about 10 tons. Meanwhile, company A saw a reduction in waste production, which was 9 tons of waste.
Overall, there is a general decrease in waste production of company A and B while company C experienced a rise over the period given.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 77
- The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 67
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 85
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owly to about 11 tons of waste. In 2015, the proportion for company B decreased t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71725789113 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449541284404 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3189655071 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1818181818 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329763327971 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145740040625 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087587422494 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253177187038 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707411436426 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.