The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph given presents the amounts of waste produced by three companies, namely Company A, Company B and Company C over a span of 15 years in tonnes.
Company A in the year 2000 gave out the maximum amount of waste. It then steadily decreased its waste output over the period of 15 years bringing it down to 8 tonnes in 2015. In 2000, Company B generated 8 tonnes of waste and increased dramatically in the year 2005 to 11 tonnes. From the year 2005, there has been a drastic fall in the waste production by Company B and it fell to 3 tonnes only in the year 2015. Company C has been consistently peaking in their waste production from 2000 to 2015. They had begun as the company producing the least waste and continued over the years to be the company that generated the most waste.
So, in conclusion, we can say that Company C has risen to be the most polluting company, whereas Company B has effectively reduced their waste production and managed to produce the least waste by 2015. Company B has steadily reduced their waste production from 2000 to 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5412371134 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49767667577 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448453608247 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6605945679 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22291983084 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11892475281 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728928981834 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196565279189 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798270122747 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.