The given line graph illustrates how much waste tonnes distributed to the environment by 3 different firms from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, throughout the period, the amount of waste produced by company A witnessed a great decline while this figure in company B decreased and the last one fluctuated.
From 2000 to 2015, company A tried to reduce their waste as much as possible as the waste tonnes at the beginning were peak at 12 and then plummeted to nearly 8 tonnes at the end of the period. Turning to company B, starting at about 8 tonnes in 2000, the figures increased to approximately 10 tonnes in 2005 and then experienced a greater plunge compared to the company A statistics ( from 10 tonnes to 3 tonnes in 2015).
Coming to corporation C, commencing at about 4 wast tonnes in 2000, the amount of waste created by this corp continued surging more and more until ended at 10 waste tonnes in 2015, nearly assemble the peak of company B.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram illustrates how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge compared to the company A statistics from 10 tonnes to 3 tonnes in 2015. Com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60714285714 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66273093917 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7347247165 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.8 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185941349403 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123584121342 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673213210817 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138018252707 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649757047441 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.