The given line graph illustrates the amount of industrial waste discharged by 3 corporations, namely A,B, and C between 2000 and 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the levels of wasted produced by company C experienced an upward trend, while the opposite was true for the other merges over a period of 15 years.
In 2000, about 12 tons of garbage discharged into the natural environment by company A, which was also the highest recorded figure during surveyed period. Meanwhile, company B ranked the second position in terms of the amount of waste released, with approximately 8 tons. After that, the year 2005 witnessed a reversed tendency regarding waste production between company A and B. While the figure for company A saw a modest decline to 11 tons, the amount of track generated by company B rose dramatically to about 10.5 tons. At the end of the period, both companies mentioned above produced smaller amount of waste, reaching a bottom of 8.5 and 3 tons, respectively.
In contrast, despite having the most environmentally-friendly proceduce, company C continued to rise slightly the amount of track into the living space, from 4 to 7 tons in 2010, before a sharp increase to 10 tons over the last 5-year period.
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 73
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 78
- The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 78
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
...e discharged by 3 corporations, namely A,B, and C between 2000 and 2015. Overall,...
^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e opposite was true for the other merges over a period of 15 years. In 2000, ab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90384615385 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03247645688 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6214509452 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360615538086 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145171537963 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430007047322 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191660887833 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456182303807 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.