The graph illustrates how the amounts of waste produced by A, B, C companies between 2000 and 2015
Overall, it is clear that company A had the highest waste produced in 2000 , but in the following 15- year- period, company C was the highest. While the waste output in companies A and B decreased, the waste produced by company C increased.
To begin, the amounts of waste produced by company A decreased gradually from 12 tons to 9 tons. In comparison, the waste output from company C increased considerably from 4 tons to 7 tons between 2000 and 2010. In the same period, the amounts of waste produced by company B sharply rose from 8 tons to 10 tons between 2000 to 2005 and then, this figure dropped dramatically by 3 tons in the next 5 years.
Following that, there was a sudden decline in the amounts of waste output by company B by 4 tons from 2010 to 2015 and bottomed out at 3 tons in 2015. 2010 saw a gradual decrease in waste produced from company A by 1 ton during the 5-year-period. Opposite that, the amounts of waste output by company C increased significantly by around 3 tons from 2010 to 2015 and this figure peaked at 10 tons in 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...A had the highest waste produced in 2000 , but in the following 15- year- period, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41588785047 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67010774916 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420560747664 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4837535748 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318165377321 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198300178984 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104260869792 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258653885484 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078469650173 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.