The given line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste output over the period from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen from the graph that there were significant changes in the amount of waste materials in all three firms. In addition, it is noticeable that the waste production of company A and company B experienced a downward trend in contrast to that of company C.
In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, followed by 8 tonnes of company B and about 4 tonnes of company C. Afterwards, a dramatic decrease to around 8 tonnes of waste was witnessed in the amount of waste produced by company A in 2015, while the figure for company C underwent a significant increase to approximately 10 tonnes of waste by the end of the period.
Meanwhile, from 2000 to 2005, the waste output of company B grew minimally to reach its peak of 11 tonnes of waste , prior to a considerable fall to merely 3 tonnes of waste in the last 10 years.
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian towns 61
- Some people think that children under 18 years old must receive full time education To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trend in contrast to that of company C. In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tic decrease to around 8 tonnes of waste was witnessed in the amount of waste pro...
^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to reach its peak of 11 tonnes of waste , prior to a considerable fall to merely ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50857142857 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68662295895 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508571428571 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4122769601 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347512989749 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191442647455 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601571309361 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226762461515 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065693653936 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trend in contrast to that of company C. In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tic decrease to around 8 tonnes of waste was witnessed in the amount of waste pro...
^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to reach its peak of 11 tonnes of waste , prior to a considerable fall to merely ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50857142857 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68662295895 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508571428571 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4122769601 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347512989749 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191442647455 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601571309361 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226762461515 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065693653936 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.