The chart illustrates the changes of average amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the following four countries: United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, we can make the conclusion that the total emissions of the of carbon dioxide in the four countries in 1967 is less than that in 2007.
From the chart, we can notice that Itaty and Portugal share a similar increase trend during that period. The average carbon dioxide emissions had a remarkable change in this 40 years, with approximately an initial emissions number of 4 metric tonnes in 1967 to 7.8 metric tonnes in 2007. In the same time, Average emissions in portugal also showed a similar trend, from about 1.8 metrics tonnes in 1967 to 5.6 metrics tonnes in 2007.
In contrast, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted in United Kingdom and Sweden indicated a downward trend in that 4 decades, although these two countries had different changing patterns in the first 10 years. We can observe that compared with a steady decrease from 11 tonnes to 8.4 tonnes, Sweden had a considerable increase from roughly 8.3 metrics tonnes to 10.2 metrics tonnes, the highest tonnes of this country, and it experienced a significant decrease in the last 30 years.
- Scientists use living animals to carry out research. Some people think it is interesting, while some others think it is cruel. What is your opinion ? 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- Scientists use living animals to carry out research. Some people think it is interesting, while some others think it is cruel. What is your opinion ? 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 56
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97630331754 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5563877364 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2178925752 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323064762683 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179214102997 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149108169089 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246660922683 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156267119405 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.