The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph displays the amount of carbon dioxide emissions by each person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007. Units are measured in metric tonnes.
Overall, the quantity of carbon dioxide emissions in the UK and Sweden decreased dramatically over the period, while in Italy and Portugal they both increased.
Even though the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by each British dropped consistently from roughly 11 metric tonnes in 1967 to around 9 metric tonnes in 2007, it remained as the highest throughout the period. In Sweden, it started at almost 9 metric tonnes, then rose to a peak of just over 10 metric tonnes in 1977, before declining significantly to a low of just over 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
The Italians began the given period as the third highest contributor of carbon dioxide at approximately 4 metric tonnes but ended up as the second highest emitters of carbon dioxide with nearly 8 metric tonnes in the final year. Portuguese emits a negligible amount of carbon dioxide at just over 1 metric ton in 1967. However, the figure grew each year to around 5 metric tonnes in 1997, then subsequently remained stable until 2007.
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The chart below displays the shares of expenditure on selected categories in the United States, Canada, the UK and Japan in 2009. 56
- The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012 61
- The charts below give information about the amount and types of water in the world and also tell the use of water in three countries 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90862944162 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5918962661 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1872079432 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220048393432 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119059598163 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819111393719 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177698904949 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799406347158 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.