The graph below shows average carbondioxide emission per person in the United Kingdom,Sweden
summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and comparisions where relevant.
The line graph compares the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by an individual in four different countries over a period of 40 years.
Overall, United Kingdom and Sweden demonstrated a downward trend in the rate of emission of carbon dioxide after 1977, while Italy and Portugal continued to rise.
In the year 1967, nearly 11 metric tons of co2 was emitted per person in United Kingdom and below 9 tons in Sweden. Although, Sweden reached its peak of 11 tons in 1997 there was a sharp in the rate of emission by 1987 and the fall continued till 2001where under 6 metric tons of co2 was emitted per person. Italy and Portugal represented relatively low emission on an average of 4.4 and 1 ton respectively in the year 1967.
The average co2 emission per person in United Kingdom and Sweden was much higher between 1967 and 1977, nevertheless there was a steady fall in the following three decades, where U.K registered 9 tons and Sweden just over 5 tons. Interestingly, same trend was not noticed in Italy and Portugal as they demonstrated continuous growth. By the year 2007 the average co2 emission in Italy was under 7 and Portugal recorded around 5 tons which is almost thrice the amount of emission to 1967.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of 40 years. Overall, United Kingdom and Sweden demonstrated a downward trend...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ide after 1977, while Italy and Portugal continued to rise. In the year 1967, ...
^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic tons of co2 was emitted per person in United Kingdom and below 9 tons in Swed...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as emitted per person in United Kingdom and below 9 tons in Sweden. Although, Sw...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...below 9 tons in Sweden. Although, Sweden reached its peak of 11 tons in 1997 ther...
^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and Sweden was much higher between 1967 and 1977, nevertheless there was a stead...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...there was a steady fall in the following three decades, where U.K registered 9 to...
^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...n the following three decades, where U.K registered 9 tons and Sweden just over ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7323943662 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58075933009 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50234741784 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7737660758 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278613420196 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139720919777 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698605661708 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162535613367 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857100909828 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.