The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories.
The line chart illustrates how many hours being spent by four different car brands to produce vehicles in the US from 1998 to 2005.
Overall, there was a decrease in the the amount of time to produce cars, with the most dramatic decline being seen in the latter. Additionally, Toyota and Honda observed a significant fluctuation in the number of hours to produce cars throughout the period.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 1998, among the four brands, Toyota and Honda spent the the smallest hours manufacturing cars, with negligible figures of 22 hours each. Although Toyota and Honda experienced a minor fluctuation in the time spending to produce cars, the figure for two car brands did not change in 2001. The amount of time being spent by Toyota and Honda to produce cars rose steadily to 24 hours in the next year, after which fluctuated again and finally reached at 20 hours.
With regard to the remaining car brands, in 1998, General Motor was the leading car manufacturers in the average hours to produce vehicles, reporting 32 hours. In the following years, the figure for General Motor sharply decreased to 22 hours by the end of the period. Meanwhile, the number of hours being spent by Ford saw a minor fluctuation, reaching around 31 hours in 2001 before dropping gradually to under 22 hours.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people by age group visiting the cinema at least once per month in one particular country between 1978 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of unemployed people aged between 15 and 24 in five European countries in 2005 compared with the overall percentage of unemployment in those countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featu 73
- The charts below show the comparison of time spent in minutes per day by UK s Males and Females on household and leisure activities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...2005. Overall, there was a decrease in the the amount of time to produce cars, with th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...2005. Overall, there was a decrease in the the amount of time to produce cars, with th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...the four brands, Toyota and Honda spent the the smallest hours manufacturing cars, with...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...the four brands, Toyota and Honda spent the the smallest hours manufacturing cars, with...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81057268722 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55548378782 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493392070485 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3720713104 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233990793232 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106372886778 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664867893337 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157935875544 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526469992817 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.