The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011.
Summarise the main features and make comparisons where needed
The chart demonstrates changes in the prices of the world food and oil over a period of 12 years, from 2000 to 2011.
Overall, it is clear that the food and oil prices both increased with a strong correlation of 93.6%, indicating a similar trend in changes between two commodities.
As displayed in the graph, in 2000, the food price index was 90 points and average oil price was around $30 per barrel. Over the next four years, the prices remained relatively stable until they started to rise gradually in 2004. From 2004 to 2007, the prices was doubled, with food and oil prices were at 130 points and $60 per barrel respectively.
After that, it went up dramatically within just a year and a half, reaching a peak of 220 points for food price and $130 for average oil price. However, the prices quickly experienced a downfall in 2009 to only one-half of the peak period. Finally, in the last two years, food and oil prices recovered and rose once again to 170 points and $140 per barrel accordingly
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | Tran Mai Phuong | 95 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- Choose three of the following media and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Identify the most effective one:Books, Comics, TV, Film, Theatre, Radio 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57222222222 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4799131307 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.4578872183 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.875 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252607328721 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123348036443 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667651481909 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174471104138 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390846345002 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.