The bar graph illustrates the estimated maximum population of elephants in a range of Asian countries in both 1997 and 2004.
In most of countries, the population for elephants fell amongst projected periods. The most interestingly, Malaysian elephant and Thailand elephant plunged in its population more than half the figure in 1997. In the former, the number of elephants dropped as low as 1000. Indian, on the other hand, remained the same as the largest population for elephants, but experienced of a dramatic fall in numbers so that in 2004, the number reached at 7500. The smallest population was China, as witnessed from the graph, its size was as small as 1000 elephants in 1997 and it dropped in half to as few as 500 elephants by 2004.
Although the trend is downward in overall, elephant populations were remained stable in Vietnam and Laos at approximately 1000. The only country where it shows a recovery trend in population in elephants was Cambodia where number has risen to around 1200.
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 78
- Bar Chart 73
- The bar graph below depicts information about the average hours of unpaidwork* per week done by people in different categories. 11
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
... countries in both 1997 and 2004. In most of countries, the population for elephants fell amon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97041420118 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81374479356 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1366763137 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211639493669 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103174190964 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494359470669 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157015792786 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03696353355 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.