The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007

The line graph compares three sectors in terms of consumption of spreads over the period of sixteen years starting from 1981.
It is clear that the total consumption of margarine, low fat and reduced spreads as well as butter fluctuated between 1981 and 2007 . The most dramatic increase was seen in low fat and reduced spreads.
In 1981, around 90 grams of margarine were consumed, whereas the figure for butter was over 140 grams. Until the mid-1996s, low fat and reduced spreads appeared with the number of 10 grams.
The consumption of butter fell dramatically to only 75 grams, a drop of almost 70 grams. While the usage of margarine went down to 40 grams, the low fat and reduced spreads saw a decline in 2007

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-03 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user dkklinkkk :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f consumption of spreads over the period of sixteen years starting from 1981. It...
^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... butter fluctuated between 1981 and 2007 . The most dramatic increase was seen in ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, well, whereas, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 594.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 126.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.35036895883 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46885240354 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 162.0 283.868780488 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4342849526 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8571428571 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244907123283 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114738140294 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104311525334 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161113025493 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880288836091 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.