The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
From 1981 to 2007 the consumption of 3 different spreads (margarine, butter and low fat and reduced spreads). This information shown in a line graph and unit are measured in grams.
Overall, the consumption trend of 3 kind spreads were decreased. At the beginning of the year, butter was the most popular spread, but since 1996 low fat and reduced spreads was introduced and it could become the most favourite at the end of the year.
In 1981 the amount of butter was more than 140 grams and the amount of margarine was more than 80 grams. Start from 1981 to 1986, butter growth was climb and margarine movement was declined. The loss of butter trend was started since 1986. Based on the graph, from 1986 to 2007 trend for margarine was fluctuated.
From 1996 to 2001, the consumption of lowfl fa and reduced spread was rocket to above 80 grams. 6 years later, low fat and spreads was slightly reduced.
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The development of tourism contributed to Eanglish becoming the most prominent language in the world Some pople think this will lead to English beloming the only language to be spoken globallt What are the advantages and disadvantage to having one languag 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban suburban and rural households in a certain country that had Internet access between 2011 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selelcting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66459627329 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38431664378 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515527950311 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4454269571 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256013081885 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122978724353 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964948591742 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185566246776 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084299600647 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.39 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.