The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007

The line graph compares the amount of three spreads ( margarine, low fat and reduced spreads and butter) which were consumed over 26 years period show from 1981 to 2007.
Overall, It is clear that the figure for butter was the highest in 1981. By contrast, The consumption of spreads from margarine was the lowest around 1981.
With regards to the amount of butter used, it began at around 140 grams and then peaked at 160 grams in 1986 before decreased sharply to around 40 grams in the last year. In addition, around 90 grams of margarine was eaten in the first year, after which the figure for margarine rose dramatically to 100 grams in 1991 and dropped to a low of 81 grams in 2001.
on the other hand, the consumption of low fat and reduces spreads only started in 1996 at about 10 grams. Over the 5 years later, the amount of low fat and reduces spreads were rose sharply to 82 grams, at which point this figure started to fall sharply to 70 grams in 2007.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (26 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aph compares the amount of three spreads margarine, low fat and reduced spreads a...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... margarine was the lowest around 1981. With regards to the amount of butter use...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... dropped to a low of 81 grams in 2001. on the other hand, the consumption of low ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41573033708 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16979063857 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.429719783 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223023870041 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129911971276 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131822918689 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17636539664 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132092368371 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.