The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph illustrates how much fish and different types of meat were consumed weekly in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, while the number of gram of chicken eaten increased gradually, that of lamb and beef experienced downward trends over the given period. In addition, the amount of fish reamined unchanged. It is also clear that the consumption of beef was the highest out of four from 1979 to 1994, which was surpassedby that of chicken between 1999 and 2004.
In 1979, the amount of beef consumed atood at roughly 225 gram, 150 gram higher than that of fish. Five year later, ater decreasing sharply at around 175 gram, the former grew to nearly 200 in 1989. Meanwhile, the later remained unchanged roughly 60 gram from 1979 to 2004. There was a moderate fall by about 75 gram in the consumption of beef within 15 years from 1989.
In 1979, the numbers of gram of lamb and chicken eaten was at about 150 gram. An opposite partern can be seen in these figure. While the amount of chicken consumed underwent moderate growth to around 250 gram, that of chicken declined significantly to 75 gram.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...t of beef consumed atood at roughly 225 gram, 150 gram higher than that of fish. Fiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...consumed atood at roughly 225 gram, 150 gram higher than that of fish. Five year lat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
..., ater decreasing sharply at around 175 gram, the former grew to nearly 200 in 1989....
^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...the later remained unchanged roughly 60 gram from 1979 to 2004. There was a moderate...
^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
.... There was a moderate fall by about 75 gram in the consumption of beef within 15 ye...
^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...lamb and chicken eaten was at about 150 gram. An opposite partern can be seen in the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...underwent moderate growth to around 250 gram, that of chicken declined significantly...
^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...of chicken declined significantly to 75 gram.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69387755102 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39728605403 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0323132788 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6363636364 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16911583909 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716932933612 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914392474973 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136584603086 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113857546948 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...t of beef consumed atood at roughly 225 gram, 150 gram higher than that of fish. Fiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...consumed atood at roughly 225 gram, 150 gram higher than that of fish. Five year lat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
..., ater decreasing sharply at around 175 gram, the former grew to nearly 200 in 1989....
^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...the later remained unchanged roughly 60 gram from 1979 to 2004. There was a moderate...
^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
.... There was a moderate fall by about 75 gram in the consumption of beef within 15 ye...
^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...lamb and chicken eaten was at about 150 gram. An opposite partern can be seen in the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...underwent moderate growth to around 250 gram, that of chicken declined significantly...
^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...of chicken declined significantly to 75 gram.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69387755102 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39728605403 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0323132788 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6363636364 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16911583909 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716932933612 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914392474973 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136584603086 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113857546948 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.