The line chart compares the quantity of four types of meat namely chicken, 20, lamb and fish consumed by people in Europe between 1979 to 2004. Units are measured in grams per person each week.
Overall, consumption of chicken increased, whereas beef, lamb and fish became less preferable among Europeans over the period given. Furthermore, chicken was the most commonly eaten meat in the end.
Around 150 grams of chicken was eaten by each individual per week during the start in 1979. This figure then Rose gradually over the years to reach a high of around 250 grams in the end.
On the other hand, because most consume weight in 1979 at 210 grams coma following which it reduce initially over first two years and then it grammatically through to reach at just below 250 grams in 1983. After this popularity of beef fell steadily to attend a low of about 120 grams in the end. Likewise, lam follow the similar trend starting at 150 grams in 1979 and ending at around 75 grams, decreased by almost half. Changes in fish consumption was unremarkable as it experienced a minor fluctuation to decline by 10 grams from 60 grams in 1979 250 grams in 2004.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works 84
- Academic IELTS Writing task 1 Sample 103 - Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 11
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...79 at 210 grams coma following which it reduce initially over first two years and then...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... reach at just below 250 grams in 1983. After this popularity of beef fell steadily t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, likewise, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69607843137 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41640315948 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593137254902 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2689264947 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13348228208 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547546892852 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423622708158 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827478395025 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028919501654 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.