The bar chart illustrates the worldwide sales of four different types of games namely mobile phone games, online games, console games and handheld games in seven years between 2001 to 2006. Units are measured in billion dollars.
Overall, handheld games remained the most popular of all during the period given. Furthermore, purchase of handheld games, mobile games and online games increased throughout the time, whereas demand of console games showed a gradual decrease.
With regards to sales of handle games, it was just below 12 billion dollars in 2000, after which it rose steadily to reach a peak of just below 18 billion dollars in 2006. Both online games and mobile phone games were introduced later in 2001 and 2002 respectively. They followed a similar trend accounting for less than 1 and around 1 billion dollars in 2001 and 2002 respectively before experiencing a considerable growth to attain a sales of about 7 and about 8 billion dollars in the end respectively.
On the other hand, the business of console games declined by half over the period starting at approximately 6 billion dollars and ending at approximately 3 billion dollars.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- Academic IELTS Writing task 1 Sample 103 - Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 73
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...een 2001 to 2006. Units are measured in billion dollars. Overall, handheld games rem...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 937.175257732 104% => OK
No of words: 190.0 206.0 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12105263158 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7128962557 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 127.690721649 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 290.88556701 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8616147138 44.8134815571 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 76.5299724578 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 16.8248392259 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 4.34317383033 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371940459963 0.216113520407 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13902612034 0.0766984524023 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835641369751 0.0603063233224 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205615571991 0.12726935374 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921348747365 0.0580467560999 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 8.37731958763 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 70.7449484536 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 7.45979381443 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 8.71597938144 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.