The Pie Charts illustrate what percentage of electricity was produced from three main sources namely thermal, nuclear and renewable in Germany and France in 2009. It also provides data on 5 subtypes of renewable electric generation.
Overall, Germany produced more electricity than France in 2009. Why conventional thermal accounted for the majority of electric production in Germany, reference preferred nuclear power as the main source. Furthermore, Biomass and hydroelectricity were the major contributor to renewables in Germany and France respectively.
In terms of total electricity production, the German depended mainly on conventional thermal type with figure of almost three fifth of total at 59.6%. Raised two fifth of power was created by nuclear and renewable type with value of 23 and 17.4%. On the other hand, around three fourth of electricity was generated by nuclear sources in France. Remaining 24% was created from thermal and renewable with thermal being the least of all at 10.3%.
With respect to different kind of renewables comma almost three quarter energy came from Biomass and wind in Germany, whereas 80.5% of French renewables comprised hydroelectric generation of energy. Surprisingly, solar power was the least utilized renewable in both nations with 6.1% and 0.9% in Germany and France respectively. In addition, both the countries had no provision for harvesting electricity from geothermal currents.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works 84
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 11
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 78
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, whereas, in addition, kind of, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65137614679 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99959316042 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6924690386 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.23603664747 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239099343701 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997806825953 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676784073816 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17030519522 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676612269649 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.