The line chart represent the rate at which some diet rich in protein were eaten in Europe for over twenty years. In all, there is a decrease in the consumption of beef, lamb, and fish, while the number of chicken taken by the Europeans increased over the time under review.
During the period been studied, there is a sharp reduction in the volume of beef consumed to less than 200 and then rose to peak at 250 in the year 1984, it then plateaued for about 5 years between around 1885 and 1989, after that, it slumped to less than 150 in 2004. The lamb witness a fall from 150 in 1979 to just above 100 before 1984, after which there is a slow reduction to reach its lowest at over 50 in 2004. It is indicated that the fish eaters reduced from above 50 to about 50 around 1979, and remains steady for over a decade before it finally dropped by the year 2004.
Compared with beef, lamb, and fish, the demand for chicken increased constantly from just below 150 to almost 250 from the year 1979 to 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opped by the year 2004. Compared with beef, lamb, and fish, the demand for chi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32631578947 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.00898259831 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6909186148 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135981708082 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714604624676 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274321484488 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951564245088 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189182109535 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.43 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.