The line graph illustrates’ about four kinds of meat (chicken, beef, lamb, fish) consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004. The consumption is measured in grams.
Overall, the consumption of beef and lamb decreased over the period given, while for chicken it rose. The amount of fish consumed almost remained constant except for a slight dip in the initial years. At the start of the period, beef was the most popular meat, which was replaced by chicken from 1989 to 2004.
With regards to the amount of beef eaten, it began at around 210 grams person and then peaked to 240 grams in 1989 before falling dramatically to about 100 grams by the end of 2004.
On the other hand, the consumption of chicken started below 150 grams which had seen a steady increase with a slight fluctuation in the middle years before reaching a high of over 250 grams per person. Likewise, the popularity of lamb had decreased constantly before sinking to 60 grams. Fish, which was the lowest consumed meat among others had been constant for the given time period had outlays between 55 and 45 grams per person.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across arange of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. For today’s world, which system is appropriate? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, then, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78238341969 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44922668914 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4695483936 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146721521728 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668850145358 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698989966241 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109519358884 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897075882923 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.