It has always been a controversial issue on whether the secondary schools should teach general or specific education. Most of the countries in the world follow a curriculum covering all the basic subjects at secondary level of education. While, there are few countries like Finland, where they teach students with specific subjects following their interests. Both types have their merits and demerits. I will be delineating about my views over the topic.
To begin with, the general education that includes a wide range of subjects from biology to mathematics and geography to economics can play a crucial role in shaping a child’s future. An introduction to all the topics at the secondary level allows them to choose their career which they are most inclined to. Making right decisions about the career wouldn’t make him feel regret in the future and would allow him to concentrate on the deeper parts of his subjects. For example, a child having only biology in the school would force him to become a doctor. Instead, if he was aware of the various other topics he would have opted for the right area in which he could excel.
On the other hand, students who have specific subjects would have an edge having a couple of years of experience ahead of children who are having their general education. This kind of education is mainly for the students to excel in their career with good job opportunities. But, they have some disadvantages while they grow. If they are oriented to only specific subjects, then they might find it difficult to solve some problems they face in life. For example, a child who has been studying about economics related topics might face problems if he had to do first aid or if he had to repair some minor issues with gadgets.
In conclusion, it is evident that both have advantages and disadvantages. In my opinion, children should be trained in all the general subjects and should also be taught to select their careers according to their interests. This allows them to consider specific subjects in their higher secondary education.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...who are having their general education. These kind of education is mainly for the students...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xtent. In my opinion, children should be trained in all the general subjects and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65879951783 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8946724566 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146464723311 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456301870886 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310757271347 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858528554835 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016110814578 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.