The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph depicts the number of grams of fish and three kinds of meat consumed by a person in a week in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
As can be seen from the graph, the consumption of fish and three types of meat were fluctuated during the given period. It is also clear that fish was the least common type of food in that European country.
In 1979, beef had the largest consumption at 240g which was fourfold of the figure of fish while the data of chicken and lamb were hovered around 150g. The number of lambs digested in 1980 was replaced by the equivalent figure of chicken at 150g. There was a significant decrease in grams of lamb to 70g per person in weekly basis at the end of the graph.
The data of beef hit a peak at 240g per week only to drop dramatically to 120g a week while the figure of chicken witnessed a sharp climb to 250g per week and became the most favorite meat in 2004. Fish consumption reduced slightly from 70g to 40g per week per person during the time shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
- The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 61
- The chart shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argued that it is better to try and improve such situations. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32291666667 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20822891852 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494791666667 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6911666243 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233273397196 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113613818908 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108562216151 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177888560554 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12125591806 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.