The given line graph illustrates the amount of intake of fish and various other types of meat in grams per person per week in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
It is noticeable from the graph that the least favoured food item among the Europeans was the fish throughout the year, whereas, it was chicken which was commonly opted by people since 1989.
It can be seen that in the first 10 years, the quantity of fish consumed by an average individual was nearly 50 grams per week, in fact, it gradually decreased after 15 years and reached almost 45 grams per week. Probing further, meat varieties such as beef and lamb showed a similar trend. The intake of lamb and beef during the initial years were almost 150 and 220 grams per week respectively; however, as years passed the consumption of both the items dramatically declined to nearly 55 and 110 grams per week. Moving forward, it is chicken which on the initial years followed a similar trend as that of lamb, while, increased substantially to 250 grams per week by the end of 2004.
- The two pie charts show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant. 73
- Some people think that spending a lot on birthday celebrations and wedding is a waste of money.But others think that it is important to young people and the society.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to th 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and vie your own opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, whereas, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5935828877 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40073005949 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6608388046 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.166666667 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143585730931 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083406620341 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782438932565 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128370687181 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844267528184 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.